DeFi protocol gets a global rating

In what is a first for DeFi, if not the entire crypto sector, the DeFi protocol Compound Treasury announced that it has received a credit rating of B- from S&P Global Ratings. According to Compound, this is the first time a major credit agency has issued a rating for an institutionalized DeFi protocol.

The S&P Global Ratings provides a scale of investment suitability, ranging from AAA (extremely strong) to D (in default). A score of B- indicates, “the issuer can meet financial commitments, though vulnerabilities to business, financial and economic conditions persist.”

S&P revealed that in arriving at Compund’s rating they had to consider “the uncertain regulatory regime for stablecoins, such as USDC. stablecoin-to-fiat convertibility risks and the Compound Treasury’s “limited capital base” along with a 4.00% per annum return obligation” in making the decision. However, the rating agency also said that the Compound protocol’s record of zero losses measured in USDC partially mitigates the risks of the offering.

Compound Treasury’s general manager Reid Cuming commented, “S&P’s rating helps our institutional clients more easily understand the opportunity and risks of crypto-powered cash management.” It is continuing to have discussions with S&P regarding the rating and said, “Compound Treasury’s ratings could be upgraded in the event of greater regulatory clarity for digital assets or a longer track record of solid performance.”

The Compound Treasury and its yield is supported by its underlying DeFi lending Compound protocol. To date, some 301,650 liquidity providers have deposited $6.94 billion worth of digital assets into the protocol, while 9,275 borrowers have taken out $1.83 billion worth of loans. Compound Treasury’s yield is above that of savings accounts at major US banks, however at the moment, the yield from Compound Treasury is only available to accredited investors or those meeting significant income and net worth thresholds. 

Non-custodial wallets are under threat

What is the difference between a custodial and non-custodial wallet? The prime difference between custodial and non-custodial cryptocurrency services is that the private key is managed by third parties in the former, whereas it is handled by users in the latter case.

The EU is proposing some regulatory changes regarding these wallets managed privately by users. On March 31, the European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) approved provisions to Europe’s Transfer of Funds Regulation that restricts Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) from transacting with unhosted wallets without verifying their owners’ identities beforehand. Furthermore, VASPs will be required to report all crypto transactions worth more than 1,000 EUR to relevant anti-money laundering authorities.

As Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase says, “Imagine if the EU demanded your bank to report you to the authorities every time you paid your rent, simply because the transaction was over 1,000 Euros.” Armstrong also said that the regulation amounts to treating “every person who holds crypto differently from fiat.” And if you use Coinbase, or indeed any other centralized exchange, if you are being sent a transaction that is above €1,000 in value, “Coinbase will be required to collect, store, and verify information on the other party, which is not our customer, before the transfer is allowed.”

Patrick Hansen of Unstoppable Finance remarked, the upshot of such a piece of regulation would mean that transactions between non-custodial wallets and centralized exchanges “would become way more costly and burdensome” due to the data collection requirements.

Furthermore, Hansen pointed out that the databases storing names, home addresses, and other sensitive personal data would become the target of hackers and criminals, which could lead to increased incidents of hacking, phishing, and physical violence targeting crypto users. He also warned that the provisions of the regulations could have even more drastic effects in the future, namely that the EU Commission could “potentially move to impose an outright ban on transfers between VASPs and non-custodial wallets in the future.”

Fortunately, the legislation has not yet been passed, and a debate on it will start this April. Hansen is hopeful: “Individual voices from the council and commission make me optimistic that we can still achieve changes.” If the legislation does pass, cryptocurrency businesses will still have nine months to adopt plans to adopt and implement the regulation, and 18 months until they must ensure full compliance.

Fireblocks advances DeFi in capital markets

You may have noticed mentions of Fireblocks across a range of crypto-related articles. Now the crypto custody market has partnered with FIS, the Fortune 500 technology provider to banks and capital markets firms, to offer crypto services.

This deal will enable FIS’s 6,400 clients to access large crypto trading venues, liquidity providers, lending desks and decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. Who are FIS’s clients? A mixture of asset managers and hedge funds, as well as banks and brokers.

Adam Levine, Fireblocks’ Head of Corporate Strategy, said, “This is going to be a great opportunity to empower FIS’s clients to access all the weird and wonderful things of digital assets. Whether that’s holding a variety of cryptocurrencies, making payments on stablecoins, accessing lending and borrowing platforms, or accessing permissioned DeFi, which is appropriate for the regulated institutions that we’re talking about.”

It may seem like just another day, another deal. But, when you look at how regularly we are seeing similar stories in the crypto-related media, it is a clear indication that institutions are edging closer to crypto – provided the right sort of know-your-customer (KYC) is made available to them. In this case they will have been reassured by Fireblocks’ close relationship with Aave Arc to provide just this kind of support. Levine said, “FIS clients would absolutely have the opportunity to participate on Aave Arc; obviously, they will have to go through the KYC-related whitelisting process, which we don’t anticipate being a challenge.”

FIS is in a strong position as the big banks explore crypto products, even if they just dip their toes in the water with crypto derivatives. John Avery, FIS head of product for digital assets explained that since FIS is a fintech provider with 30 years of experience, they are well-placed to provide what the big banks are seeking. Avery said, “There are investors who will seek out synthetic exposure as their only means of access to crypto and digital asset investing. But for the market makers and the brokers, they will need access to the underlying physical assets.” He added, “The appetite of traditional clients to control their own wallet technology and get exposure to different types of these assets will grow over time, either for their own portfolios or to support their structured products or derivatives businesses on top.”

When will Apple enter crypto?

More big names are in crypto these days, including the US government Recently Joe Biden signed an executive order on crypto, aimed at advancing the “U.S. competitiveness and leadership” in digital assets and crypto ecosystem. But, as Derick David writes at Forbes, the one big name a good number of the crypto community are waiting for is – Apple!

Apple has been extremely quiet about crypto. The last time we heard anything from the company was in 2019 when Apple Pay’s VP Jennifer Bailey said the company was “watching cryptocurrency” and strongly believes it has “interesting long-term potential.” In February 2020 it hired Warner Music’s former head of technology innovation, to work on blockchain projects for digital assets, and in November 2021 Tim Cook told the new York Times that Apple was looking into the possibility of accepting crypto through Apple Pay. But since then we’ve heard nothing.

Instead, Apple Pay launched a new feature in February 2022. This allows retailers to use their iPhones to accept instant payments and is called Tap to Pay. It could be used for crypto, but it isn’t.

However, there was one interesting development in March this year: Metamask, one of the most used crypto wallets, announced its support for Apple Pay so people can buy crypto directly from their wallets. Derick David points out that at the same time as this announcement, Apple advertised for new legal counsel “with expertise and experience on blockchain, digital assets, and payment platforms.”

Around the same time, Apple acquired Credit Kudos, a UK-based fintech startup, bringing a range of payment functions in-house. This gives Apple the potential to offer a crypto service that would enable people to buy products, save or invest money, and pay their bills with crypto or fiat – if Apple chooses to adopt crypto! The combination of Credit Kudos and Apple Pay could “help billions of users have a frictionless banking and payment experience,” as Derick David says.

Why is the crypto community so anxious for Apple to come on board? It’s simple really. Apple is in a unique and powerful position to best support crypto. It has over one billion active iPhone users and fans of the brand follow “their software and hardware ecosystem and hundreds of thousands of people wait in excitement for their Keynote events and product releases.”

The Apple ecosystem could supercharge crypto adoption, simply because it would offer seamless integration through their products, a global reach, and a cult-like following.

It is still keeping quiet for now, but when it does decide to make a crypto move, expect big, big positive changes for crypto.