Bank-fintech collaborations are the way forward

The 2019 outlook for banking

Image result for The 2019 outlook for banking

I’ve just come across a new report from Deloitte titled ‘2019 Banking and Capital Markets Outlook: Reimagining transformation’. I was interested to read its opening sentence: “The global banking system is not only bigger and more profitable but also more resilient than at any time in the last 10 years.”

According to The Banker’s Top 1000 World Banks Ranking for 2018, total assets reached $24 trillion and the return on assets was 0.9 percent. This data would seem to say that at the end of the decade following the financial crash (caused b the banks, lest we forget) banks are in great shape. You may feel they don’t deserve it, but that appears to be the situation.

Banking health isn’t global

However, this healthy environment isn’t a global phenomenon. Deloitte’s says that the USA is ahead of its European counterparts. This is due to “aggressive policy interventions and forceful regulations” Deloitte’s claim, and the result has been healthier American banks.

By contrast, European banks have been held back by structural deficiencies, overcapacity, low/negative interest rates, and the absence of a pan-European banking regulatory agency have all likely contributed to European banks experiencing persistent profitability challenges.

European banks have been shrinking in size, retreating from international markets and exiting businesses that were profitable for them in the past. To illustrate this, just look at the fact that the profits of the top five European banks dropped from $60 billion in 2007 to $17.5 billion in 2017.  However, Western European banks seem to be faring better these days, with an ROE that grew to 8.6 percent in 2017, compared with 5.5 percent in 2016

On the other side of the world, the Chinese banks have been the big story. Not only has the Chinese banking industry has surpassed that of the European Union (EU) in terms of size, the world’s four largest banks in 2018 are Chinese. Compare this with 2007 when there were no Chinese banks in the world’s Top 10.

A recession is coming?

But the Deloitte report sees some gloom on the horizon. Deloitte economists are predicting a 25 percent probability of a recession in the United States in 2019, and this is likely to weaken US economic growth in 2020, if not in late 2019. Although we are almost at the year’s end already. And the Deloitte forecasts for GDP growth by region shows most of the regions in decline, or flatlining  just past 2020.

Where can the transformation happen in banking?

Partnership with fintechs is one approach. Deloitte says more digital transformation is required. However, Deloitte asks, “But how much of this change is purposeful and strategic? “ It comments: Banks should bolster their conviction and reimagine transformation as a holistic, multiyear process and “change how they change.”

Deloitte also suggest that the transformation “should fundamentally start with banks reaffirming their role in the global financial system.,” but it adds a warning: “Banks should discard grand visions of becoming “a technology company” and instead focus on customers, enhance trust as financial intermediaries, facilitate capital flows, and provide credit to the global economy with data as the bond that sustains the amalgam of technologies—AI, automation, cloud, core modernization, etc.—best suited for the purpose.”

 

 

 

When banks partner with fintechs

How the neobanks tackle banking’s big problems

Neobanks are having the same effect on banking, as quantum theory did on our ideas about reality, Medici suggests. Furthermore, digital banking has become a part of our everyday lives.

Stash CEO, Brendan Krieg, claims that his company has gained over 3 million customers since 2015. He says that the reasons as to why they have become so popular is that they’ve studied the consumer, and discovered that the average person wants to live a better financial life. Perhaps it is unsurprising that Stash’s average user is a 29-year-old who makes $50k a year, not a bad salary for a Millennial these days. But, success, Krieg suggests, is down to the fact that Stash’s app makes it easy for people to invest.

As Medici points out, the neobanks have gained their successes because they are meeting the customer where they are and are finding ways to connect advice, banking, and investing in one experience.

This applies not just to Stash: it’s a global phenomenon. The leading success factor for the major neobanks’ growth appears to be their superior customer experience compared to the traditional banks.

The redesigned mobile and web applications, and smooth customer onboarding, have enabled players like Monzo, Atom and Starling Bank to grow at speed.

Also, by eliminating costs associated with physical branch maintenance, neobanks are able to reduce the fees associated with key products.

However, while the customer experience seems to be the neobanks’ key selling point, there is another factor. They are solving the bigger issues with conventional banking.

For example, they are looking at innovative product offerings and improved customer service. Medici gives the example of Open, a neobank in India. It has integrated automated accounting and payment gateways with their current account offering. Furthermore, its platform enables startups and SMEs to integrate banking and accounting in one place using a multi-bank connect feature. And Open helps startups and SMEs to manage employee expenses in a seamless way.

Another example from India is InstantPay. It is focused on bridging a gap that traditional banks have not looked at since banks opened in India, and that is some time ago. InstantPay drives financial inclusion in a responsible and sustainable way and has reached 10,000+ PIN codes, and caters to 50 million unique customers.

Anish Achuthan, CEO of Open, said, “Most Startups & SMEs generally use multiple dashboards and interfaces for invoices, bookkeeping, and online payments. Making vendor payments and employee payouts have always been a challenge. All of this drains entrepreneurs and finance teams of their time & energy.”

Western neobanks have been successful largely because of the customer experience they offer, while in the Asia-Pacific markets the neobanks have to take a step further by answering core banking problems in the industry, such as like ‘knowledge transfer,’ ‘undocumented logic,’ ‘technical debt,’ and a ‘skills/desire gap’.